Last edit:
29.Sep.2013, 12:38h

3d print close up

Many people wonder about how a 3d printed object from an affordable 3d printer will look. How neatly is the surface, how clean does it look?

I am trying to give an answer to that today.

The object below is a jewellery piece for a friend I produced with my Makerbot Replicator 2.

3d print close up at 150 micrometers layer height
Image 1: Jewellery piece at 150 Micrometer

3d print with ruler to show how large the print is.
Image 2: The same piece next to a ruler (showing centimeters, not inches; 2.54 cm = 1 inch) to show you the size of the pice

For me any my Makerbot it is less clean if I print at 100 microns (the layers are noticeable smaller, but I get more left overs on my surface). While 150 micrometer prints will look quite as aspected, 100 Micrometer prints are often less clean. This seems to be the way, because the slicer (a script which will prepare the 3d object for printing) is a different one when using MakerWare.

This is an image of such a print.
Important! The light has changed in this image. This image has been taken at about noon today, while the other images where taken in the evening yesterday.

3d print close up at 100 Micron with small problem.
Image 3: The jewellery piece at 100 microns with a few leftovers and small printing problems

And to show it all: This is the object in Makerware 2.2.2 exported with 1024 divisions from A:M v18.

Piece of jewellery in Makerware 2.2.2
Image4: The jewellery piece in Makerware 2.2.2

...and here is the object in Hash Animation:Master v18:
3d object for 3d print in Hash Animation:Master
Image 5: The jewellery piece in A:M v18

Hopefully I could show you what to expect and where the limits are of a Makerbot Replicator 2. Just to mention it: The adjustment may be a factor here too. I have updated and changed my Makerbot Replicator 2 and it may be that you will receive slightly different results with newly assembled machines from Makerbot. I do not dare to say if these will be a little bit better or less good, but I'd say it should be at about the same quality as my prints.

If you've got any questions of wishes for other photos, please let me know!

X

You are using Google Chrome...

Do you know that Google is known for not respecting your privacy and using your data without really asking for it?
For instance Chrome will scan your computer and the files you saved on it, transfers data about your internet surfing to Google and creates a extensive profile about you as a Chrome user while combining those data with all other services of Google.

Additional information can be found here: Why you should not use Google products if you can avoid it.

Because of that I highly recommend using another browser:

 
X

If my website sucks, you do not need to visit it.
Have a nice day and think about how much you have payed to visit it? Nothing...
How many ads do you see at it? None.

How much money do I earn from it? Nothing.
Does it cost me something to host it? Hell yeah.

I do not see why I should provide it to you to be insulted?